I would like to offer a new, easier-to- understand perspective on the School Board’s recent $31,000 retroactive raise that was given to the now-retired District Supt. Dr Laura McGaughey. If you think about how many days of the year she worked, it might come to 300 annually. Her negotiated contract with her employer, the School Board, called for $123,000 in salary, which is all the School Board would show the public. The Board refused to publicly account for her non-salary compensation or benefits. If you divide $123,000 by her 300 days worked, you come up with $410 a day. But by adding the $31,000 retroactive raise to her salary, this makes her last year’s salary $154,000. Divide that figure by the same 300 days ,and it now calculates to a salary of $513 a day. What logical reason could there be to give an already retiring employee a $100 a day retroactive raise? Is this good, sound fiscal management? It looks to me as if there’s more to it than what the School Board offered as trying to make the School District look more competitive in the marketplace. The best way to look competitive is to be competitive by offering the next Superintendent a competitive wage, not by spending that money on a past employee.
Shhh, School Board at Play
A Refresher Course
The Retirement of Benefits
Therefore, the agency has adopted a policy requiring disclosure and expensing of retiree benefits on an accrual basis, that is, as the employees earn their benefits.
Blacks Unwelcome Is That the Message?
Yet, when presented with the possible transfer of three hundred and thirty-seven permanent students — right at our doorstep, asking to come into our district — the district cannot find time to fairly, consider the request from Ladera Heights.
Houston, We Have a Problem
The Selling of the Fear Factor
Half the truth is often a great lie — Benjamin Franklin, statesman, author, inventor (1706-1790)
I cannot get over the feeling that a major, unspoken but agreed-upon reason exists for the School Board’s staunch opposition to the proposed transfer of students living in Ladera Heights.
The Board does not seem to be giving the community all of the facts involved with the transfer, just the negative aspects. The reasons that have been given sound like excuses for continuing the status quo.
A Peek at School Boards Ladera Resolution
Culver City Students Less Fit?
Are Culver City students in the middle grades as healthy and fit as the boys and girls in neighboring communities?
When a comparison is drawn between students from the School District and students from the South Bay who took the California Fitness Test, most South Bay schools fared better.
In results taken from the Web site of the California Dept. of Education, Culver City finished down the line.
The Answer Should Have Been Yes
Condition #2: The districts are each organized on the basis of a substantial community identity.